Process Circles
Process Circles provide pathways to guide practitioners through the process of making a significant impact upon a designated locale, such as a city, a town or an urban region. Linked to guidelines for each of the stages, a Process Circle provides a broad management overview that can be used for small or big projects. It can be used to guide a focussed and discrete project or to frame a general sustainability plan that includes many sub-projects.
Stages and Phases
Move your cursor over the Circle to see more details.
Process Circles are organized around an iterative process pathway with defined stages of activity: commitment, engagement, assessment, definition, implementation, measurement, and communication. Each of the process stages is divided into a series of phases, organized in a logical sequence of activities as part of the broader Circles of Social Life approach. The various phases of the pathway are linked to associated tools and methods. These tools are designed as part of an integrated, cross-referenced set that can be used as a comprehensive guide or as singular tools, each of which can be taken out of the toolbox and used with or without reference to the other tools.
STAGE |
|
PHASE |
ACTION |
TOOL |
COMMIT
|
|
Affirm commitment to making a difference |
|
|
Establish management structure |
|
|
Choose framing considerations |
Choose general issue |
|
Choose general objectives |
|
Choose spatial and temporal frame |
|
Resource the project |
|
|
Entrust collaborators and form a critical reference group |
|
|
Empower local communities |
Seek critical community feedback |
|
Adjust chosen objectives |
|
Accord recognition to partners |
|
|
Determine strengths and weaknesses |
Determine contested social themes |
Social Themes Process |
Analyse data and documents |
Analyze existing existing public data |
|
Analyze existing policy documents and research |
|
Analyze existing indicators |
|
Research social context |
Research community responses |
Social Life Questionnaire |
Research urban context |
Urban Profile Process |
Research individual responses |
Strategic interviews |
Project outcomes |
Project future scenarios |
Scenarios Projection Process |
Project program scenarios |
Intelligent Cities Simulator |
Clarify materiality considerations |
|
Clarify driving forces and risks |
|
Identify critical issues and indicators |
Identify critical issues and objectives |
|
Resolve tensions between objectives |
|
Identify core indicators; choose targets |
‘Critical Issue’ Identification Process |
Refine project parameters |
|
|
Review project plans |
|
|
Enable project support |
|
|
Liaise with constitutents |
|
|
Revise the plan periodically |
|
|
Document project implementation |
|
|
Reassess profiles and processes |
Reassess Social Life Questionnaire, and evaluate changes
Reassess Urban Profile and evaluate changes
Reassess Social Themes Profile and evaluate changes
Reassess Knowledge Profile and evaluate changes
Reassess Strengths and Weakness Profile, evaluate changes
Reassess Social Themes Process and evaluate changes
Reassess Scenarios Planning Process and evaluate changes
Reassess Intelligent Cities Simulator and evaluate changes
|
|
Evaluate project |
|
|
Publicize the process and outcomes of the project |
|
|
Report to all constituents and relevant agencies |
|
|
Advise communities and all levels of government |
|
|